<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shawn Medero &#187; web as a corpus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shawn.medero.net/tag/web-as-a-corpus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shawn.medero.net</link>
	<description>An Online Notebook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://shawn.medero.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Google Counts Considered&#160;Harmful</title>
		<link>http://shawn.medero.net/2005/11/20/googlecounts-considered-harmful/</link>
		<comments>http://shawn.medero.net/2005/11/20/googlecounts-considered-harmful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Medero</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web as a corpus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shawn.medero.net/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Language Log has what can be considered the definitive look into whether or not Google query results counts are meaningless for social language&#160;research. Language Log has also posted several other entries on this topic worth&#160;reading: Googlinguistics: the good, the bad, and the&#160;ugly Google recall (They stole his mind,now he wants it&#160;back.) More arithmetic problems at&#160;Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002658.html">Language Log has what can be considered the definitive look into whether or not Google query results counts are meaningless for social language&nbsp;research</a>.</p>

<p>Language Log has also posted several other entries on this topic worth&nbsp;reading:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002652.html">Googlinguistics: the good, the bad, and the&nbsp;ugly</a></li>
<li><a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001836.html">Google recall (They stole his mind,now he wants it&nbsp;back.)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001840.html">More arithmetic problems at&nbsp;Google</a></li>
<li><a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000397.html">Google frequency agen (um, agin) (oops,&nbsp;again)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000194.html">Google-sampling: avoiding pseudo-text in&nbsp;cyberspace</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shawn.medero.net/2005/11/20/googlecounts-considered-harmful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
